Basically, when we're talking about the news service, it's determined within the news service, but we also watch very carefully to make sure there is a balance in the programming. We also have a very sophisticated—it has been recognized as the best in the world—ombudsman system in order to check on us to make sure we are doing the job correctly. We take extremely seriously the concerns when voiced to us, and they are regularly voiced, because often it's not a balance that people want, it is an expression of their opinion or their side that they want. We get this all the time in international affairs, in particular, where one side or the other or both sides of an issue are very concerned about how we have presented the issue. It's our job to try to be balanced and fair, and we have determined, with the ombudsman's guidance, certain procedures.
So sometimes a show may seem to be overbalanced in one direction; there must be a show very soon after that is balanced more in the other direction. We have set up rules so that we're not just doing boring television in the name of balance, but we're doing fair television, and fair means representing all sides or allowing all sides a chance to be represented. Again, the key is an ombudsman system to hold us to account and as a check. I think even more important is the work we're now trying to do by using all of our media interrelated.