Well, it's not Friday, but it is frosty, because I just agreed with Mr. Bélanger. That's with respect to the fact that this is before the CRTC. As a matter of fact, my understanding is, further, that they've actually extended the time for commentary. So they're obviously seriously working on this.
I'm really wondering what the value is of having CBC/Radio-Canada come before the committee at this time. What are we going to discover in two hours? I know everybody jumps on me because I'm always talking about the amount of time it takes for a minister or a ministry, or whatever, to come up to speed, to respond to a report, or to appear before a committee, but it's a fact of life. What are we going to be discovering with the CBC? They're going to have to be very circumspect, particularly going into the mandate review.
I remind the committee that we have museums, the archives, the library, the art gallery....
The art gallery, for example--something that I discovered as a result of the cooperation of the department, for which I was very grateful--is looking at the fact that they may be needing over $100 million in terms of their requirements. Certainly the Museum of Science and Technology is on the front page of the Ottawa Citizen today. The archives, I've indicated, are very interesting. There are any number of things we could do on a one-off basis where we would end up adding to our collective wisdom about this humongous department called Heritage Canada.
So perhaps reports to the Auditor General might be of value, but continuing to focus on the CBC when I don't know what we would accomplish with two hours with them, when there are all these other things...I don't think there's any real value.