I think you're creating an accurate characterization of the situation, because it's just not on the radar screen for people who are trying to do other things. The priority is down the ladder, and I think naturally enough. If you're sitting in a corner office and you have to do some new programming and you have new media, heritage just doesn't get to the top of the pile.
When you start to think of things that have been squirrelled away in the various departments and that people have in their files...many people have said, “I have to preserve this, because this is too important to let it go somewhere else”, and all of a sudden you find that across the country the CBC and other organizations are just resplendent with these little treasure troves that have to be ferreted out. This is why we suggest that there needs to be a strategy for the CBC to be able to unearth this and then provide a means of using it and making it accessible.
With respect to the museum, we have been advised that the museum will close. If you are on a tour, you'll see the museum itself, which is open to the public, but you'll see that there are also two vaults that house a number of other artifacts, among the many others that reside within the system.
I think the message is not clear, but the message is that we, the CBC, hope to try to use some of these artifacts in new spaces that we may be creating, but the route of that is very clear, and who's going to look after the artifacts, administer the artifacts, keep track of them, and look after their preservation is not at all clear.