There is a range of positions they put on the table. Fundamentally, our view is that this country—and you certainly don't need Corus to tell you this—ust isn't big enough. We sell programming in 120 countries around the world, so we know the world market pretty well. You simply can't make the big-budget productions in Canada without some form of support in the form of a CTF, and there are other funds as well, such as the Shaw Rocket Fund. Corus has funds. Most broadcasters have different kinds of funding. We really need that, as an industry, to support the development of high-quality programming. So fundamentally, that's our first view of that.
As we suggested earlier, there does need to be some assessment of how some of those funding mechanisms work. I would put that in a category of whenever you develop any kind of a policy system you need to step back from it every once in a while and see if it is working in the manner you would hope it would work in the context of how the world is changing. For example, one of the changes we're looking for is less of a bias against vertical integration. We make that argument and we use our track record to say, “Look, we've made terrific programming. We've put hundreds of millions of dollars of our own money on the table. You should allow us, not all the time but some of the time, to use some of these funds in order to create a program that's going to run right through the broadcast properties that we own.” Similarly, with the CBC, there should be times when if it has a terrific idea, it should have the ability to access those funds and do the same thing.