It's a very difficult issue. I come back to the arm's-length question. I think what you have to do is be prepared to say we're setting up a process and a system. We have appropriate and reasonable oversight over that system. The system is equipped to hire and fire the right people. Those people have to be left to determine what is and what isn't good journalistic practice, if I can pick on that particular aspect of things.
I would submit to you the minute anybody outside that ambit becomes involved in what is and what isn't good journalism, you're on a very slippery slope. You're getting to the point where you're putting yourself in a position to deal with things that you really don't want to deal with in the final analysis. You have to let people do what they do, if I'm interpreting your question correctly.
I don't think you want to make recommendations about details at that level. I think you want to stay at a higher level than that when you talk about this kind of thing.
Is it sufficient?