Just for clarification, is it the intent of the motion, then, to bring forward a new study on this? Are we looking to write a report? From what was stated there, I'm just confused. Are you looking at doing an additional study to the one we're currently undertaking? My hope would be that we could hear from the appointee, make our decision in a single meeting, and then move on, to ensure that we can continue down the CBC mandate review.
From what I'm hearing, I'm not sure we're on the same page as each other on that issue. Are we, or am I getting something different?