Finally, on the question of governance, I heard you say that you wouldn't want many more processes involved in appointments, because very often people are waiting and so on. We've had recommendations from the industry and from third parties that perhaps we should have some kind of vetting system that would allow experts to identify potential board members.
I don't think this is intended to reflect on the quality of the people who have been on the board in the past, but it offers a level of quality control or a certain guarantee that there's an external, broad-based interest of experts who would recommend appointment by directors.
Would you see that as, at least potentially, an improvement--to assure that? I'm not saying that there's not quality there now, but just to make assurances of that. And if that were to happen, would the government not be more willing, perhaps, to let the board pick the president? If you have that guarantee, then I think you're less likely to want to make sure you pick the president to make sure that you have the guarantee there.