As I understand it, you're required to do this kind of audit of the CBC every five years or so. How would you compare conclusions? I mean, you must have come to pretty much the same conclusions five years ago. Have you noticed any improvement?
I'm sure someone said to them five years ago, ten years ago, even fifteen years ago that they didn't have the systems in place to measure if they were efficient or not. This is an old corporation. It seems odd to me that 50 years after its founding--or even more than that, 80 years after its founding--we still don't seem to be able to draw a conclusion as to whether it's an efficient operation or not.
I would like your comments on that.