That's a very interesting question, which is outside our mandate. We of course do these audits in the context of the mandate that is given to the CBC, and we are expressly precluded from commenting on the mandate.
We do note, though, the challenge for the corporation of reconciling the fact that it is competing with private broadcasters and its public policy role. Some people can view these as being in conflict, and we're stating in here—as we actually say to many crown corporations—that it is very important that they clearly outline how they interpret their public policy role and how they reconcile it with any transactions they do that are more commercial in nature. The CBC is probably one of the most significant crown corporations carrying out more commercial activities, so it is important that they define it. But I would say this really goes back to the mandate given to the CBC. At this point, it is perfectly permissible for them to do these kinds of activities, and I would suspect they view these as important in generating revenue to allow them to face many of the challenges they have.
So, would it change? I don't know. It wouldn't change the governance structure. It would still be like any other crown corporation; you would still have to have people on the board who were familiar with the industry, irrespective of how that happened. It would obviously have a much different mandate and obviously a much different financing arrangement.