The key issues identified in the program evaluation included the routine gathering of data. In that sense we have set in place a series of data-gathering methods, including a post-exhibit questionnaire that goes to all institutions and that covers the key performance indicators we need.
The second set of issues was around the vulnerability of the current ceilings for the liability we can accept, and that's the analysis that we're currently undertaking to see if we need to adjust those ceilings. Because the values of exhibitions are rising, there are fewer exhibitions that we will be able to accommodate, and there will be greater expense to the institutions as more of them rise above the existing $450 million ceiling.
The issues raised in the evaluation were quite clearly not about the performance or the problem of risk management in the first five years; they were really forward looking, saying that if the current trend lines continue, in terms of rising values, the program may become less effective. That's part of the review we're undertaking and one of the reasons we welcome the committee's required review of the act at this point, and welcome your views, as we continue this analysis.