Yes, I'm sure you're right. Obviously with the mandate as it exists, we're not getting the results that we're looking for. Do we simply say, enforce the mandate, require it to be fulfilled. Or as you're suggesting, do we need to make it crystal clear in the mandate that...? When I read the mandate, I say yes, it says it all there. But what you're saying is that we need to make it absolutely explicit that reflecting the regions to themselves means you have to put in adequate resources. You can't just say, well, Newfoundland is 1.9% of the population, so you get 1.9% of the budget, or something like that. We all know smaller areas may need a higher percentage than an urban area.
Of course, that touches on the whole question of the concentration of Canadians in urban areas and what that's doing for those of us who choose to live—or are forced to, or whatever—outside the core urban areas.
Yes, I would absolutely support you, and I'm sure our organization would, if you found a way to make the mandate sharper and more precise and harder to work around. Sure.