Can I say one quick thing to that? In terms of the last part of what you said, I think that's a provocative way of thinking about changing or focusing on the language of region itself. I would say that even in Atlantic Canada, of course, that word is loaded in all kinds of ways, as you know. Certainly sitting here it is.
To the first part of what you said, I think you're absolutely right in your description of investment in a renewed supper hour that hasn't proven to have gotten back on its legs. But we have to take the big picture. There's a kind of self-fulfilling prophecy here. In a way, it looks like a set-up. I don't mean that in some kind of malevolent way, but clearly decisions made by senior management have led to this mistake.
There is a part of me that worries about the argument that we should let others handle CBC or engage in the bigger problem of CBC. In part, I think that's true; everybody has to look at the whole system, or the people who are invested in it have to look at the whole system wisely. But CBC management has to take responsibility for its own mistakes. And that's a very serious part of all of this, as well. So long as the very top brass is appointed and there are patronage appointments--this is now becoming an old story in this country--we're going to have problems with senior management, and we have for quite some time. There's a real disconnect between that management and the regions, however you define them.