No, I don't believe that is the case. The case, as far as we understand it, is that the move to 60 minutes was meant to be done with virtually the same resources that the 30 minutes had been able to access or utilize. That was very clearly stated in a memo by senior management to CBC at large, that the move to 60 minutes was not to be done at the expense of national programming.
If you look across the country at what has happened to those 60 minutes, at what they're being filled with, the evidence is there. There's lots of weather--lots of weather, repeated every 10 minutes--and not many, if any, new faces in front of the camera.
So there's not a lot of difference. You really have 30 minutes extended. There's not really evidence of that infusion of money.