I think it's a question of the specifics and the details. I think we should separate the notion of transmission from content creation. We do have a good system for content creation. We don't necessarily have a great system for dissemination of that content creation.
It's not a question for me of new media, because that just becomes smaller and smaller and smaller niche dissemination. It's a question of how to make it a broad public discourse and engage a broad public in the discourse, both of the arts and of the culture in general.
It's interesting to me that in Quebec one does seem to understand that a public discourse is necessary. In English Canada, a public discourse isn't. There are programs across the broadcast spectrum in Quebec that do engage in the arts, in politics, in literature, in dance every Sunday night for an hour. This is nothing but public discourse, and nothing does that on the other side.
So it isn't a question of content creation or even dollars. I mean, we've looked at the underfunding of the CBC; we've spoken about that a lot. If you were to start from zero, or look at a smaller country and say you have this much money to make television, and you're complaining...? If you were starting from a zero-based budget, you might find that there were lots of resources. Don't ever say that--of course give them more money. But that isn't the issue to me. To me, the issue is public discourse.