It's worse in the west. I find it extremely important that you have informed us this morning about what is going on in Radio-Canada television because we know about Canada's duality. That duality is also felt in the area of values. However, we are increasingly headed toward the right, and Canadian women are losing what they have acquired in the past 30 years. It is urgent that women be there to make documentaries for us, to reflect us, to give us a vision of what you are experiencing, of what we are experiencing as women with our children, our everyday burdens, and so that we can tell the rest of Canada that enough is enough: we need different services.
That said, we aren't here for political reasons, but I nevertheless want to send that message. Bravo! Congratulations! And know that that hasn't fallen on deaf ears. I'll try to come back to it.
My question is for Ms. Simard in particular.
You talked about Radio-Canada, saying that it had to be a strong broadcaster that must continue to do more. Ultimately, you were virtually talking about excellence as well. I'd like to know what that implies in concrete terms, in three or four lines. What, in your view, is a strong broadcaster?