That's very good, and I'm not opposed to parity on boards of directors or cabinets. On the contrary, I wholeheartedly applaud that. However, people often forget to require a 50% split in public funding for creation. That ultimately might be understood in a private business, but, when you do a quick analysis of TVA, you see that TVA was more advanced than Radio-Canada in that respect. How is it that a private business, whose purpose is to make money, is more representative of our society than our state television network, which is funded by everyone?
On May 25th, 2007. See this statement in context.