In my view, it's a broadcaster that has the means, the resources to carry out a mandate that must be clear. That's important. I think that that mandate must also clearly state a certain number of things. That's the responsibility of the body that feeds it, that is the government. But it's a broadcaster that also has to have room to manoeuvre. It isn't a government television network. We understand that: it's a public television network. That broadcaster must therefore be independent in its programming and have the resources to be bold. There is the production of information, but there is also so-called artistic, cultural production. It must be bold because excellence can also be seen in boldness, the ability to be avant-garde, to do things that others will not do because it is too risky, not conventional enough or not commercially profitable enough in the short term.
If you recall the things that have been the most striking and distinctive in the production of CBC and Radio-Canada, including in the information genre, you see that we had the means to enable creators, designers and programmers to have imagination, to innovate in various areas. That's what I mean when I talk about a strong broadcaster. Strong means having the means not only to represent everything I've said, but also to be able to do it in an entertaining and seductive form. For me, that is a strong broadcaster.