Nothing was justified. It's more subtle than that. Federated sport, of course, doesn't sell and isn't profitable. It's not for no reason that TVA and TQS aren't involved: it's not profitable for sponsors. When you don't believe in it, it's so easy not to cover it, not to talk about it and gradually not to go to it. You see in the few bits of information we've given you that the withdrawal has been gradual. A program was replaced. The introduction of Au-dessus de la mêlée is fantastic; it concerns sport. But it doesn't replace the newscast. They don't talk about federated sport on it; they mainly talk about professional sport, particularly hockey or boxing, because it sells more. That's the path they've taken.
So there has to be a will, a belief or an obligation for Radio-Canada to carry out a mandate that concerns federated sport. That is why we have recommendations that are much more specific concerning healthy living habits. There are mandates that are identified when there are specific revenues coming from sport. We have nothing against professional sports coverage, but let's use that to support federated sport. In that respect, I think we're reflecting a will and a desire to be part of a culture that is a culture of sport.