No, definitely not. We think that's important.
I'm going to add something else. In the conditions it sets for artists, particularly in its in-house productions, Radio-Canada is a leader, an example to follow. When production shifted from Radio-Canada to independent producers, for artists, actors, performers, that marked a very distinct decline in their working conditions in general. I don't know what the situation is for writers, but, for us, there was a very big difference relative to what existed before and with regard to quality, with regard to the time that we had to produce a television program when Radio-Canada did the production and broadcast the programs. That changed a great deal when we went toward independent production, where people wanted to make all that profitable.
I'm not sure of the cost that independent production represents in the equation relative to what existed before, because a lot of tax credits are granted for independent producers; a lot of money is invested in that.
That's a minor comment somewhat related to the question Mr. Scarpaleggia referred to earlier.