Thank you very much.
I appreciate your efforts to clarify this, and I think it speaks to the point. I guess the point for Canadians who are watching and listening to us today is the fact that it was a doctored photo, and the photo not only was a misrepresentation of actually what happened, but it was a misrepresentation because it was such an outdated picture that in the duration of time from when the photo was taken to the time it was published on the website, the smoke stacks were torn down. So it was a complete misrepresentation.
I think it speaks to the sensitivity that you have to engage in at CBC, yet it wasn't intended, you assure us, to mislead Canadians. But in fact it did mislead people because it was there to support an opinion that was being brought forward with the article it was published with.
I think that's the concern that many Canadians have, that you're a broadcaster, but you have a public trust to maintain, because, of course, Canadians expect to trust their national broadcaster. Obviously, there was major sensitivity around this, and unfortunately for CBC, this isn't the first and maybe won't be the last. But I think it's important that there be a strong statement after these types of things are done, as to the fact that it won't happen again.
So I'm wondering if you can clarify as to what type of statement was made and what assurances you can provide us with to ensure that this kind of biased type of reporting doesn't continue in perpetuity.