My other point has to do with firewalls. I understand that you have a firewall. I also understand that there are firewalls for private broadcasters as well. The argument from those who say that private broadcasters are too sensitive to commercial interests is not so much centred on the head of Procter & Gamble calling the news chief and saying he didn't like your story; it becomes more of a subconscious notion that we're not going to get a call on this, but we know that the head of the corporation won't be happy if we do too many stories that are anti-business or whatever, because we get our money from them. So even though there's a firewall, there's a subconscious kind of notion that we have to be careful.
Wouldn't that exist at the CBC as well, but in a different way, especially in a context in which funding isn't stable? There would be a firewall, but reporters and news directors would be aware that if we take too many runs at the government, since our funding is renewed every two or three years or whatever, we'd better be careful. Wouldn't it be the same system working, obviously not in reaction, necessarily, to advertisers but to government sensibilities?