I would like to have the opportunity to also debate this, but before I do, I just need a bit of clarification from our clerk.
I'm curious because of my lack of knowledge of Standing Order 108(2). I wonder if we could have information pursuant to what in this order specifically relates to the motion by Mr. Kotto. In other words, if Mr. Kotto's motion is that the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage recommends that the federal government do this, I have no difficulty with that. I'm just wondering what the specific reference to Standing Order 108(2) is. I don't understand that.
This is not a criticism; this is for a point of information.