The next question I'll ask carefully, because it may be sensitive. I've been involved in a fund-raising campaign for one of our local museums. It was to build and expand our local museum. Then I was asked to be involved in the neighbouring communities, and then down the road we went. Right now there are seven different museums involved, in close proximity to the city I live in.
It causes me to wonder how much is too much. When do we decide that, in terms of the long-term viability of each of these museums, we might fall into a situation of challenge where we're not able to sustain everything we're building?
Of course, every local community and every ghost town wants to honour the past in that specific location. It goes back to that whole thing of having something tangible—the bricks and the mortar—to touch and to feel in order to experience the past.
How do we as parliamentarians from the federal level start the discussion as to how we can manage things to ensure we don't leave a huge burden to future generations that they're unable to sustain?