I think it may be useful to talk about the two existing heritage programs that depend on the criterion of national significance. One, which is no longer in our portfolio, is the national historic sites program in which very clearly across the country there are national historic sites that reflect quite a diverse understanding of national importance.
The other is the movable cultural property program under which, to be eligible for certification, objects and collections need to pass a national importance test. I think the diversity of objects that have been recognized through that program--which is closer to the museum experience--is quite remarkable. So I wouldn't make the assumption that because the museum is small or because it is not in a major city it doesn't possess something of national significance. I think that capacity exists in all institutions. The issue is whether they have the capacity to tell people about it or indeed the documentation to understand the importance of what they do have.