I want to emphasize again that there is something really highly irregular about this motion. Let's not kid ourselves. This motion is here because of one particular case involving one employee at CBC. That matter is presently under review, but to ask the individual who is ultimately responsible for making that decision--whose decision now, in my understanding, is being appealed--to come forward to our committee meeting here to explain the very policy that has generated this particular disciplinary proceeding is highly inappropriate. I don't know why we're even considering this. Even bringing another lower-level management employee from CBC to explain it, given the circumstances of this particular employee, is highly inappropriate.
The safest course of action here, given the fact, like it or not, that this is being generated by a particular case...the best course of action is to delay any review of that policy until such time as that matter has been disposed of. Then we can have a comfortable discussion with the CBC representative here at this table, an open and frank discussion, rather than having to skirt around virtually every issue, especially as it relates to this particular employee.