On Mr. Bélanger's last comment, I think that Mr. Siksay moved an amendment to the amendment that does what my colleague wishes.
I would just like to come back to Mr. Fast's comments. He said earlier that saying “amending the interpretation of the... policy for Canada” might be going a little too far beyond our jurisdiction. It is not really too far. When new directives are issued and we hear back from the artistic and communications world that the interpretation has changed, we know that it the case.
I am convinced that the people in the department are sufficiently well-informed about what is happening out there and sufficiently well equipped to see that new regulations will amend the interpretation of the policy. Up to a point, we can trust them on that. I do not think that we are going too far.
When new directives are issued in order to amend the interpretation of the policy, they know that before they do it. I think we could debate this for hours. That is it, Mr. Chair.