Now, I did also notice that you refer to two other parties that have a responsibility: the parents—whom I applaud you for acknowledging as having a critical role to play in making sure their children are aware of some of the dangers lurking either on television or the Internet—and the broadcasters. And I agree with you there as well.
The one party you didn't mention, which is the focus of this particular bill, is the government. If I might just read to you the actual operative section of the bill, or if you drill down, there's one operative section that says, “The commission shall make regulations respecting the broadcasting of violent scenes....” That's a very, very broad statement. It isn't restricted to viewing hours, but concerns the whole area of broadcasting violent programing.
I'm wondering if you feel the federal government has a larger role to play, as suggested by this bill, in regulating broadcast violence, or do you believe that the voluntary code—which is actually not voluntary but is part of the licensing scheme that the industry has agreed to—is sufficient to play the role the government typically would play?