The association played a big role in the Little Sister's case. We were a co-plaintive. We fund-raised on behalf of the owners of Little Sister's to be able to litigate it. Sadly, it's still ongoing, despite the 2000 ruling from the Supreme Court of Canada.
What we can learn from Little Sister's is that when architecture for censorship is created, despite the benign nature of it, we can expect to see censorship happening, unnecessary censorship. It's not justified censorship.
In the case of Little Sister's, the customs officers who were given these broad powers were not trained. They did not have the skills and qualifications to make that determination. Our fear is that we will see this happening the same way again with this particular situation.