If the goals are to bring a better balance, then there should be guidelines along with this bill stating that the purpose of this is a better balance and availability of programming. That's not the case. It's a general, broad, vague law that just says they shall have the power to make these regulations, which is very dangerous.
In terms of having more programming that's healthy and good, that's a very subjective decision to make. Who's going to make that decision in terms of what is healthy and good broadcasting? Actually, according to the principles of freedom of expression and advocates for it, we need to have a wide range of exposure to different thoughts. The free marketplace of ideas is the cornerstone of what makes a flourishing democratic society.