Sure.
I actually didn't put out a number until I was asked, because the number is I think something that you as a committee, if you go this route, might want to consider: what you think is most appropriate.
Broadcasting is a very fast-changing environment, and in particular public broadcasting. I suggested a ten-year period because it has worked very well with the BBC. It basically means that at the beginning of the seventh year of the contract, the review begins; you don't wait ten years. Basically it's a seven-year period to when you can evaluate, and then there is a year or two where you can evaluate, and then the government can come to its decision.
There is a series of decisions that have to be made in the contract. There are the objectives you have in terms of the programming service; there is the willingness and ability of the government to fund certain services; there are the questions of expansion.
So it's not something that can be done at the end of the ninth year or anything of that nature. I think a ten-year period makes sense, with the understanding that the review would probably start at about the seventh year.