It shouldn't be on any basis, unless you can provide actual numbers to justify why it is that local services and local Canadian content, which have taken the brunt of every CRTC regulatory change over the last 15 years, should be the ones to be sacrificed at this time. I would have a very difficult time going back to the public and saying that we did due diligence. We don't even know the numbers, and we are seeing clearly that the spending is disproportionate. You're expecting us to accept that in any circumstances local is going to pay. I don't know how you can justify that.
On March 25th, 2009. See this statement in context.