To answer your question very quickly—and I know Ruby Dhalla also asked the same question a couple of times—what we said specifically to the commission is that we actually tied fee-for-carriage to local programming. What we said, clearly, to the commission was that we need to know the mechanism will be put into place and in exchange for making concrete commitments to local programming.
At the time, this was a policy review hearing. We have licences, with licence commitments, but we knew the decision the commission would issue on this particular matter would be issued in September or October and we would be filing our renewals a couple of months later. So we asked that they approve this mechanism and we would make those commitments in our licence renewal, and this is tied to the provision of meeting certain levels of local programming.
We didn't get a fee for carriage. We proposed a certain level, and you know the rest.