I'll take the rest of Madame Boucher's time.
I just had a quick question, because a couple of times you've alluded to fee-for-carriage. I noted, just before I came down, that there was an article in The Globe and Mail that said that fee-for-carriage, as requested by the broadcasters, amounts to some $352 million, according to the CRTC, which is an awful lot of money. Of course, my concern is that once you go down the road of having a fee, nothing prevents that fee from being more and more, and these subscribers, who are also taxpayers in Canada, are going to have to pay it.
Without any guarantee that this would go to Canadian content--I understand you are advocating that it would be dedicated by the CRTC to specific outcomes--in other words, if it's just going to the broadcasters, or even if they're able to take that out of money they're currently using, aren't we just going to be taking money from ratepayers or subscribers and funnelling it back to Hollywood in a constant bidding war, like the private...?
You're different. You receive a subsidy from taxpayers to provide your services. They are the same people who would have to pay the fee-for-carriage. My concern is that it starts at $352 million, then maybe in a couple of years it's $700 million. And all we're really doing is shovelling more money south of the border for U.S. programming, because that's where they're making money.
Do you share that concern?