It's difficult for us to discuss a fund that doesn't exist yet and when we're not sure how it would be stated or how it would be structured. They are talking about 1% of the BDUs' revenue, or $60 million. We can't specifically say how much of that should be spent where, but our concern is that it be directed to local programming. It doesn't cost a lot of money to make a lot of difference in local programming when basically you don't have any.
We are also strongly suggesting that some of that money go to independent producers to produce local programming, because we provide the different voices. Again, not to harp on consolidation, but there aren't a lot of different opinions within the owner groups of the broadcasters these days. Two of our main broadcasters also own newspapers, so we feel it would serve the country and the production community, and the broadcasters, to diversify.
Documentary production is significantly less expensive than drama. For instance, the figures I quoted were for drama production. We would hope that the 1% would hold, if not go higher, and we would hope that it would go directly to local programming and that about 25% of it would be earmarked for independently produced local programming.