Okay, thank you.
On part (b), “protecting the integrity of Canadian broadcaster signals”, I assume by that you mean distant signals or time-shifting. Why don't we just put an end to it? The cable broadcasters are telling me they're paying 50 cents per subscriber per month for distant signals. It doesn't have any more value than that. There's been a longstanding negotiation that's supposed to have taken place that is not moving forward. They're not going to come to an agreement on it. I think we have to be realistic about the fact that we've got two sides that are dug in. They don't agree.
I think we should put an end to distant signals, to protect local markets. I can tell you that a colleague of mine, the MP for Edmonton—Leduc, had a conversation with a CTV station manager just this past weekend. They told him distant signal has taken away 40% of their revenues. That's hurting a local television station, because it can't sell ads. Why don't we just put an end to distant signals?