I wasn't there in 1999, so I have nothing to defend. What I pointed out in point 6 on the paper before you is that this is an issue that needs to be addressed if the artistic community really feels that this is out of whack. I've said that it remains to be determined whether this would by achieved by way of ratio, minimum expenditure requirements, or, for instance, by what a lot of the unions say, which is that it should be 7% of revenues earned the previous year. So if your revenues go down, you spend less; if your revenues go up, you spend more.
Now, I don't know where they got 7% from, but you can see how the system would work. Basically, the Broadcasting Act says we should have a system that's predominantly Canadian. The only way to be predominantly Canadian is that more than 50% of the time is Canadian programming. How do we have that Canadian programming? It has to be financed. If you spend all your money in Hollywood, you don't have the ability to do it here. Therefore, they suggested that. I don't know the right answer, but I have put it down on paper, saying that this is one of the issues we have to put to bed.