I'll make two points. First of all, the U.S. system is totally different from ours. It works on a different principle. So I think trying to make an analogy between one and the other....
Secondly, they have very large networks that cover most of the country. We have small broadcasters, but we also put specifically in our last BDU decision, which was last year, an expedited arbitration mechanism to resolve disputes between BDUs and small broadcasters. We have just issued several decisions under it, because we realize, given the difference in economic might, etc., that if we are not there to protect them, the cable companies could abuse their power. The mere fact that we are there, that we have that mechanism and people have availed themselves, etc., works very much as a restraining influence. If necessary, we'll invoke it.