This isn't new, I agree with you. It was true two months ago and it's still true today. There's a structural problem, and it will require structural solutions. One of the issues which is most often raised is that of fee-for-carriage. You were asked the question two months ago, and I'll ask you the question again today since there has been a lot of discussion in the intervening period.
Let me quote what you said.
On fee for carriage, you said:
We've turned it down because it wouldn't have done anything for local content, which is exactly the thing you're working on. I asked the people to understand. I said, “If we give you a fee for carriage, are you going to commit to a certain local content, especially in the smaller markets?” I got a resounding no. That's why we didn't do it.
The people who came after you, the CTVs and the Globals, said that's not true, that they didn't say that. So we have two versions here, and it's very important. Somebody's not necessarily saying the truth here.
You're being contradicted by these folks. Do you stand by the remarks you made last time?