Thank you very much.
I actually want to go back to where Madam Lavallée was. I made the assertion that most of the problems associated with CHRP had to do with the dollar figure involved with CHRP, that it wasn't seen to be enough money.
We have a number of things in the bill like the direction for a stamp to be created and so forth, and I understand that the member who brought in the bill has indicated that he would be open to removing this. I think that's good. It was problematic. I think there's consensus around that.
If this is just about an apology, if it's just about getting an apology in the House, why wouldn't you support just amending the bill such that it calls for an apology in the House?