Thank you. I just didn't want to get lost there.
In June 2006, we had the head tax apology. In May 2008, my colleagues unanimously stood up in the House to support the apology for the Komagata Maru, and at that time I didn't hear any concerns being raised by my colleagues that this would leave Canada open to all kinds of lawsuits.
So I actually don't believe this amendment is necessary. I think the original bill works fine. But if it's going to be a matter of our talking it out, I'll certainly support the motion and I'd be willing to call the question, because our views on this are well known.