Between PromArt and Trade Routes, have we now created a deficit for international touring to the point where the product is not getting out?
One of the things I've also noticed, and there seems to be something underlying here, and maybe it's a bit of a discovery for me, is that although we're talking about the grand scheme of things, if PromArt or Trade Routes—well, PromArt mostly—gave you that little bit of money, did that little bit of money allow you to leverage for a bigger amount of money on the other end, like foreign investors, like the private sector, and that sort of thing? It seems to me you're losing that base by which you could get more money. I would like you to comment on that, whether I'm right or wrong, or whatever it may be.
The other part of it was it's not just export from these programs but the import, which, Ms. House, you brought up, in effect the ECMAs, and the fact that you're importing investors, which is something new to me. I never realized either. I'd like you all to comment on that, how important it is from a financial aspect. I hear this a lot. Why are we giving money for people to bring their product, export it outside...? In your case, Ms. House, you have to export across the country, and that is difficult enough, so much so that the provincial government had to step in and pick up where the federal government left off--a common theme. I want you to comment on that, because I think that's a part of this that a lot of people don't get.