--in a court ruling, it was actually determined not to be a simple extension of the current regime.
When we had audio cassette tapes, it was pretty clear. An audio cassette tape could be used for a purpose: to record audio. That's what it was for. When we made the bridge to CDs, well, it wasn't quite as clear anymore, because they could be used for audio, they could be used for software, and they could be used for photos. So therefore, even though they extended the levy, there was less of a direct connection to it than there was with an audio cassette tape.
When we move on to devices with digital memory, which is what is proposed by the opposition, all devices with a digital memory, this, iPods, PCs, everything--