It must be understood that the motion flows from a motion unanimously adopted at the National Assembly of Quebec. As far as I am concerned, I am referring only to community television in Quebec. If you wish to make an amendment to say that this not include CACTUS, however, that suits me fine; it does not bother me. But if you want to table another one in support of CACTUS, you could do that later, as Ms. Rubby Dhalla seems to wish. Instead of excluding CACTUS, it might be preferable to present another motion in that regard later.
On April 29th, 2010. See this statement in context.