There are really two levels here. When we're talking about open access, we're really talking about access that, first of all, has to be transparent and open. It has to be broadly distributed throughout the country and accessible and not controlled in a way where a select few can choose what content comes through or doesn't come through. That's really the thesis we're proposing.
I think you're referring to a completely different issue, which is the issue of copyright and ownership of the content. I wish I could have a response to you that would make some sense. There isn't one currently, because the whole matrix is changing. Who the content creators are is changing overnight.
Historically, it has been very few and we could identify exactly who it was creating the content, and then we could channel it through and protect it. But now it's coming from all over. It's a different ball game, and the same guy who's creating music in his basement now, who has access to the world and didn't have it before, doesn't really care whether he's copied or not. A lot of this relationship has to be talking to the new people who are creating this content, because I think the notion that we have to protect him the same way we protected the major labels may not be true.
I don't know what the answer is. All I know is that the matrix is completely upside down.
Let me give just one example.