Mr. Levy, as in many other discussions held here, I would say that opinion is divided half and half. You're on the side that says we must not touch the Internet, that we mustn't set too many rules, that we mustn't slow down progress and that we have to let the situation evolve on its own. However, we realize that there are some major losers, and they are the real creators. I'm not talking about the ordinary individual who creates as a hobby; I'm talking about the people who have chosen creation as their occupation. The work of these people will often be copied, whether it be books, music or other objects of creation. Their works are put on the Internet and they never receive copyright royalties. That's a fundamental problem. I find it hard to see how we can resolve that without imposing regulations.
That's a somewhat philosophical point of view, but the idea of leaving this market completely free of all regulation makes me think of what Montesquieu said in talking about the weak and the strong, about total liberty that enslaves the weak and about law that makes them free. Law is important; it is in certain cases. If we let individuals do business with Google, even with millions of dollars, they will be cheated. We need rules that enable these people to receive compensation for their copyright. What do you think?