I don't mean to be argumentative, but in order to have successful culture, to have successful films, to have successful distribution, and to have all these things operate, there is ultimately a financial aspect.
All I was saying to you was that Lions Gate can continue to be a successful, stable company. We're concerned that the direction management is taking puts that at risk, and therefore puts the cultural part of it at risk, as well as the business part.
We tried to address that by having Lions Gate allow us, as a large stockholder, to have some board representation so that we could have better communication, but we couldn't get any of that accomplished. Now we're buying more of the stock because we fear for the viability of our investment, which ultimately underlies the viability of all this cultural programming that you're discussing.