What I've tried to explain to you is that we are concerned about the viability of this company under this management team. We would have been happy to have a couple of guys on the board of directors who could have helped deal with those issues. That viability underlies all the operations, everything that's being done.
What we're concerned about with Lions Gate isn't the things they've done historically. It isn't the television production they've done in Canada, the distribution, or the film production they've done here and abroad. That's why we invested in Lions Gate. What we're concerned about are the acquisitions they're looking at, things that will involve borrowing substantial amounts of money and putting it into more risky investments. These things raise significant issues.
I will tell you, for example, there's been quite a lot of discussion about Lions Gate borrowing money, issuing a lot of stock, acquiring the library at Miramax. There's a lot of discussion in the investment community about whether film libraries are a viable investment, and you could put the entire company at risk with an investment like that. Now, management may think that's a good idea. We don't. We think it risks the company and would thereby risk all the things you're talking about. That's the best answer I can give you.
We intend to maintain the traditional business that Lions Gate's been involved with. That's our basic understanding. Might there be acquisitions that make sense? Could you get them done at prices that make sense? Perhaps, but we're concerned about where that all goes.