I think we need to hear from the officials to explain the decision-making process, in particular. We want to know why they waited until the end to announce their decision in certain cases. I understand that the program is temporary and limited to two years. In the case of the Francofolies de Montréal festival, for example, which was a success right off the bat, they submitted a report and organizers were congratulated on their work. But they did not receive word until 30 days before the event began, despite the fact that they have to negotiate with artists who come from all over, book indoor and outdoor venues, technical people and so forth. There is something odd about telling organizers they will not get the funding a month before the event is supposed to start, an event of this size, with all the people, logistics, contracts and so on.
Therefore we need to examine that aspect with the officials. Nothing should be taken for granted. I do not think organizers of the Francofolies de Montréal festival took anything for granted. But they did have good reason to think that since everything was in order and since the event was a month away, they could keep moving forward. So they ended up having to make cuts at the last minute. Those questions should also be put to department officials.