You've outlined a series of things here in your submission. It's a little bit clustered, but the interesting thing to conclude with, and what I think is really stark in this, is that Mr. Icahn has been able to change the discussion. At this committee hearing, a lot of what's been taking place was Lionsgate having to defend its Canadian footprint versus his having to explain the net benefit to Canada. That is an interesting pattern of behaviour out there, and today we've again spent a lot of time discussing what somebody else's agenda really is.
On June 3rd, 2010. See this statement in context.