Just to pick up where Mr. Uppal is, I think there's an obvious point to it, though. If the offer was something that the board liked, you wouldn't have been on the Hill speaking to members—I assume primarily members of the opposition, because I never saw anyone from the company, but I know there was a lobbying effort on the Hill to try to block the takeover.
I assume that if the price were where you wanted it, you wouldn't be on the Hill trying to block it using “net benefit for Canada”. I think that's a fair question.